Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1017/2022

Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs V. B Sreedharan regarding money due for services

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-15
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 07/15/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Graceland Charitable Trust filed a suit against V. B Sreedharan for outstanding service charges amounting to Rs. 1,60,186. The defendant disputes the plaintiff's entitlement to collect these fees, claiming no contract exists.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,60,186 along with interest at 6% per annum.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order for payment of Rs. 1,60,186 with interest at 6% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,60,186 along with interest at 6% per annum.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established that services were rendered and that the defendant accepted those services.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff established that services were rendered and that the defendant accepted those services.
Supporting Evidence
It is established by preponderance of probabilities that the services that are being rendered in the apartment complex had been rendered by the plaintiff during the relevant period.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: i. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of 1,60,186/- (Rupees one lakh sixty thousand one hundred and eighty six only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Graceland Charitable Trust
Relation
represented by its managing trustee
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. B Sreedharan
Relation
S/o. Late Balakrishna Menon
Plaintiffs Documents
Bills A1 to A14, Legal Notice A15
Defendants Documents
Order of the Kerala Real Estate Regulatory Authority B1, Order of the Kerala Real Estate Appellate Tribunal B2

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M. R Hariraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thanuja Roshan George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Viswajith C. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gisha G. Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rejivue K. C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alina Anna Kose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vidya A. K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akhila S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Megna Mariyam M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jacob Mathew Manalil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Priya Elizabath Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount due from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 1,60,186/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the defendant or from his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These are the bills raised against the defendant for services provided.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A14
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the legal notice demanding payment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This is a true copy of the order of the Kerala Real Estate Regulatory Authority.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This is a true copy of the order of the Kerala Real Estate Appellate Tribunal.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs V. B Sreedharan regarding money due for services
Case Code Year
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs V. B Sreedharan regarding money due for services

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 06/01/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 07/15/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Charitable Trust

Similar Cases

Case between P.P.Abhayakumar vs Vidyodaya Trust et al regarding Suit for money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs Sivadasan P V regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs Molly Alexander regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs M M Mathew regarding realization of money for services rendered.
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami et al vs Venkatesh Shenoy et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won