Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1017/2022

Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs V. B Sreedharan regarding money due for services

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-15
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Graceland Charitable Trust filed a suit against V. B Sreedharan for outstanding service charges amounting to Rs. 1,60,186. The defendant disputes the plaintiff's entitlement to collect these fees, claiming no contract exists.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,60,186 along with interest at 6% per annum.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order for payment of Rs. 1,60,186 with interest at 6% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established that services were rendered and that the defendant accepted those services.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: i. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of 1,60,186/- (Rupees one lakh sixty thousand one hundred and eighty six only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Graceland Charitable Trust (Age not specified years) Door No. 9/213 C2, Pangarapilly, Mulanthuruthy – 682 314

Defendants

V. B Sreedharan (not known years) Apartment No. H3, Graceland Foundation, Paringarapilly, Mulanthuruthy, Kochi – 682 314

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the amount due from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 1,60,186/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the defendant or from his assets.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These are the bills raised against the defendant for services provided.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A14
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the legal notice demanding payment from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This is a true copy of the order of the Kerala Real Estate Regulatory Authority.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This is a true copy of the order of the Kerala Real Estate Appellate Tribunal.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 06/01/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Charitable Trust

Similar Cases