Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1026/2022

Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs M M Mathew regarding realization of money for services rendered.

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-12-17
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Graceland Charitable Trust is suing M M Mathew for failing to pay Rs. 2,03,887/- for services provided to him since June 2021. The defendant contends that the Trust lacks authority to demand payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,22,887/- along with interest and costs. The defendant's claims regarding the Trust's authority were dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay Rs. 1,22,887/- along with interest @ 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs. 1,22,887/- along with interest and costs. The defendant's claims regarding the Trust's authority were dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved that services were rendered, and the defendant enjoyed those services without paying for them.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved that services were rendered, and the defendant enjoyed those services without paying for them.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case and hence issues are found in favour of plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: Defendant shall pay Rs. 1,22,887/- along with interest @ 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree and 6% from the date of decree till payment or realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Graceland Charitable Trust
Relation
represented by its managing trustee
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M M Mathew
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Computer printouts of bills from 30.06.2021 to 31.07.2022.
Defendants Documents
Power of Attorney, Certified copy of order from Kerala Real Estate Appellate Tribunal.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M R Hariraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thanuja Roshan George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Viswajith CK
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gisha G Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rejivu K C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Alina Anna Kose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vidya A K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akhila S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Magna Mariam M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jacob Mathew Manalil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Varghese Sabu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Priya Elizabeth Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of Rs. 1,22,887/- along with interest for services rendered.
Evidence:
Defendant shall pay Rs. 1,22,887/- (Rupees One lakh twenty two thousand eight hundred and eighty seven only) along with interest @ 12% from the date of suit till the date of decree

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Computer printout of the bill
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Monthly bills issued to the defendant for services rendered from June 2021 to July 2022.
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A14
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A legal notice sent to the defendant regarding the outstanding payments.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document allowing the defendant's brother to represent him in court.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Certified copy of Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Order from the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal regarding the legal standing of the plaintiff Trust.
Reference:
Ext.B2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs M M Mathew regarding realization of money for services rendered.
Case Code Year
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs M M Mathew regarding realization of money for services rendered.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Charitable Trust

Similar Cases

Case between P.P.Abhayakumar vs Vidyodaya Trust et al regarding Suit for money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs Sivadasan P V regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs Molly Alexander regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Graceland Charitable Trust vs V. B Sreedharan regarding money due for services
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami et al vs Venkatesh Shenoy et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won