Case Summary
The plaintiff Gopi M A was absent during the proceedings, leading to a dismissal of the suit for default. The defendants included Vijayan and Mahin, with the first defendant being ex parte.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent, leading to a dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff was absent, leading to a dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent, leading to a dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff was absent, leading to a dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Counsel represented.
Judgment Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent. Suit dismissed for default. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopi M A
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayan
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mahin
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. Counsel represented. Suit is listed for trial. Since plaintiff absent. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gopi M A vs Vijayan et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Gopi M A vs Vijayan et al regarding suit dismissal for default.