Case Summary
The case involves Gopakumari as the plaintiff against Gopalan and others as defendants regarding a partition. The plaintiff was not present during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was dismissed as the plaintiff was not present.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Gopakumari
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o Surendran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Gopalan
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o Krismankutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kaliyani
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o Damdaran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shanmughan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/oKrishnankutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajan
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o Krishninkutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Sreehari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sumi.O.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Gopakumari vs Gopalan et al regarding Partition.
Case Code Year
Case between Gopakumari vs Gopalan et al regarding Partition.