O. S. No.326/2013

Case between George vs Kochukuttan regarding civil suit

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR

Judge

Smt. Sumey Chandran

Order Date

2025-09-19

Duration

Case Closed

Fri, 09/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

George and Susan are the plaintiffs involved in a civil suit against Kochukuttan and others. The case has been finally heard and the court has delivered a judgment.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit has abated due to the lack of action on the counter claim. Both the suit and counter claim are deemed abated.

Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit abated. It is brought to notice that counter claim pending. But no steps taken. Hence, counter claim also abated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: George
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Susan
Party Age: 50
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kochukuttan
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Omana
Party Age: 48
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sreekanth
Party Age: 28
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sreejith
Party Age: 26
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: P K Shaju
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K M Alias
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: G Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Suit abated and counter claim also abated.

Evidence: