Case Summary
The complainant, George T Varghese, has filed a withdrawal petition. The accused, Muhammed Rafi, is acquitted as per the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complainant's withdrawal petition has been allowed, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Complainant filed withdrawal petition. Allowed. Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- George T Varghese
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Rafi
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- T. A. Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M. A. Ribinsha
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Complainant filed withdrawal petition and was allowed.
Evidence:
Complainant filed withdrawal petition. Allowed.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Evidence:
Accused is acquitted under Section 257 CrPC.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Bail bonds of the accused are cancelled and he is set at liberty.
Evidence:
His bail bonds are cancelled and set at liberty.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
S.T.
Case Code Year
2023