Case Summary
George Cheriyan filed a suit against Joji and another defendant. The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit BCF.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected because the plaintiff was absent and did not remit the necessary fees.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not fulfill necessary procedural requirements.
Plaintiff was absent and did not fulfill necessary procedural requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and did not fulfill necessary procedural requirements.
Plaintiff was absent and did not fulfill necessary procedural requirements.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent not represented. BCF not remitted.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit rejected Order 7 Rule 11.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- George Cheriyan
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joji
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joji
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.R. Sudheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.V. Kochuthresia
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of BCF.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent not represented. BCF not remitted. Hence suit rejected Order 7 Rule 11.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2019