Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS.322/2019

Case between George Cheriyan vs Joji et al regarding suit rejection

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-07-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

George Cheriyan filed a suit against Joji and another defendant. The court rejected the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to remit BCF.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected because the plaintiff was absent and did not remit the necessary fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and did not fulfill necessary procedural requirements.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit rejected Order 7 Rule 11.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

George Cheriyan (63 years) Kannadan House, Panamkuzi kara, Kombanad Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Joji (24 years) Kurupalivayalil House, Chundakuzi Kara, Mudakkuza Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Joji (27 years) Napuzavayalil House, Puthumana Kara, Kombanad Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of BCF.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent not represented. BCF not remitted. Hence suit rejected Order 7 Rule 11.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases