Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 417/2020

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Sri. Saidu Muhammad regarding loan default

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-03-12
Duration
approximately-7 years 8 months
Case Closed
Wed, 03/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, The Federal Bank Ltd, is claiming repayment of a personal loan from the defendant, Sri. Saidu Muhammad, who defaulted on repayments. The lawsuit arose due to the defendant's failure to repay the loan, leading to its classification as a Non-Performing Asset.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendant was found liable for repayment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.2,98,313.49/- from the defendant and from his assets, including interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendant was found liable for repayment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established their claim with unrebutted evidence proving the loan was not repaid.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established their claim with unrebutted evidence proving the loan was not repaid.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A5 established the case as pleaded by plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows. The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.2,98,313.49/- from the defendant and from his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Federal Bank Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Saidu Muhammad
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan sanction printout, customer details printout, lawyer's notice dated 13.03.2020, unreturned cover addressed to the defendant.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Peter Tharakan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff granted the recovery of the outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize Rs.2,98,313.49/- from the defendant and from his assets.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff granted interest on the outstanding amount at a reduced rate.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.2,98,313.49/- from the date of suit till date of decree.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff granted interest on the outstanding amount from the date of decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.2,98,313.49/- from date of decree till date of realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff granted recovery of the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant and from his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Sanction Printout
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the loan sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Customer Details Printout
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides details of the defendant related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the defendant about the loan defaults.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Unreturned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the delivery attempt of the notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Loan Account Statement Printout
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the outstanding amount owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Supports the claims made by the plaintiff based on witness testimony.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Sri. Saidu Muhammad regarding loan default
Case Code Year
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Sri. Saidu Muhammad regarding loan default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 08/23/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won