Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 114/2024

Case between THE FEDERAL BANK LTD. vs ANIL. K. A et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Smt. Divya Natesan
Order Date
2025-05-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, The Federal Bank Ltd., filed a suit against the defendants ANIL. K. A and REMYA. C. K for the recovery of a housing loan amounting to ₹6,09,710. The defendants admitted to the loan and expressed readiness to repay within a year but sought to deny some penal interest charges.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in part, allowing the plaintiff to recover ₹6,09,710 with interest but denied penal interest due to RBI regulations. The defendants were given a year to repay the amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of ₹6,09,710 with interest at 9.68% per annum
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in part, allowing the plaintiff to recover ₹6,09,710 with interest but denied penal interest due to RBI regulations. The defendants were given a year to repay the amount.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants admitted to the plaint claim and were ready to repay the loan within a year.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants admitted to the plaint claim and were ready to repay the loan within a year.
Supporting Evidence
Since, the defendants filed a conceding written statement stating that, they are ready to repay the loan amount within 1 year, the suit is decreed with costs.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
THE FEDERAL BANK LTD.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
ANIL. K. A
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
REMYA. C. K
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. K. Manoj Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Suresh Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 6,09,710 with interest @ 9.68% per annum, from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Evidence:
Since, the defendants filed a conceding written statement stating that, they are ready to repay the loan amount within 1 year, the suit is decreed with costs.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Claim of penal interest of 2% is denied.
Evidence:
However, the claim of penal interest of 2% is denied as it is against RBI regulations.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between THE FEDERAL BANK LTD. vs ANIL. K. A et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between THE FEDERAL BANK LTD. vs ANIL. K. A et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ARJUN MOHAN et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JAMES. K. P regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Vijaya Bank vs Mr. Thanseer et al regarding realization of an amount due from defendants.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MUTHURAJ regarding execution petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won