Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1333/2024

Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Mushar Naisam et al regarding suit for money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-12-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Federal Bank Limited filed a suit against Mushar Naisam and Mami for the recovery of loan amounts. The case concerns two loans availed by the defendants and the subsequent defaults in repayment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff bank, ordering the defendants to pay a specified amount along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of litigation.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants 1 and 2 shall pay an amount of ₹4,41,479 with 10% interest per annum. Defendant 1 shall pay an amount of ₹4,20,003.64 with 10% interest per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff bank, ordering the defendants to pay a specified amount along with interest. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of litigation.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved its claim with unchallenged evidence and documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved its claim with unchallenged evidence and documents.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim. So, a decree can rightly be passed as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. 1) Defendants 1 and 2 shall pay an amount of ₹4,41,479 (Rupees Four Lakhs Forty One Thousand Four Hundred Seventy Nine and Fifty Nine Paisa) with 10% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Federal Bank Limited
Relation
represented by its Associate Vice President and Branch Head Anson Anotny
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mushar Naisam
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mami
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement for Federal Personal Car Loan Scheme, Agreement of Guarantee, Statement of account bearing A/c no. 14217400003244, Statement of account bearing A/c no. 14217600004224.
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Syriac Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Madhusoodanan K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vrinda K.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Angel Mariya Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shreya Shree
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants shall pay an amount of ₹4,41,479 with interest.
Evidence:
Defendants 1 and 2 shall pay an amount of ₹4,41,479 (Rupees Four Lakhs Forty One Thousand Four Hundred Seventy Nine and Fifty Nine Paisa) with 10% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant No.1 shall pay an amount of ₹4,20,003.64 with interest.
Evidence:
Defendant No.1 shall pay an amount of ₹4,20,003.64 (Rupees Four Lakhs Forty Twenty Thousand and three rupees and Sixty Four Paisa) with 10% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement for Federal Personal Car Loan Scheme
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the 1st Defendant as principal borrower.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement of Guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the 2nd Defendant as guarantor.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Computer printout of the Customer Inputs document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentary evidence under Banker's Book Evidence Act.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: BYOM Loans - Terms and conditions
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentary evidence under Banker's Book Evidence Act.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued for the loan account period.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: SARFESI Demand notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendants for clearing dues.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Copy of the lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendants regarding legal action.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Statement of account for A/c no. 14217400003244
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentary proof of outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Statement of account for A/c no. 14217600004224
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentary proof of outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Mushar Naisam et al regarding suit for money.
Case Code Year
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Mushar Naisam et al regarding suit for money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won