Case Summary
Petitioners seek eviction of respondent from a room to start a Mini Super Market due to arrears and alleged reduction of room value.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Explain the main legal or evidentiary reason stated by the court for granting or refusing relief.
Judgment Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today. The petitioners are entitled to realise the cost of the petition from the respondent.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Fathima (51 years)
Kundil House, Ponmundam amsom desom, Tirur Taluk
Muhammed Afeekh (33 years)
Kundil House, Ponmundam amsom desom, Tirur Taluk
Ashikh (21 years)
Kundil House, Ponmundam amsom desom, Tirur Taluk
Hamna (16 years)
Kundil House, Ponmundam amsom desom, Tirur Taluk
Defendants
Rajan (40 years)
Cherupurakkal House, Niramaruthoor amsom desom, P.O.Niramaruthoor, Tirur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the room to start a Mini Super Market
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property within one month from today.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued on 17-8-2015
Reference:
A1
Document Type:
Reply Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Dated 26-8-2015
Reference:
A3
Document Type:
License Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Dated 23-9-2003
Reference:
A6