S.T. No:40/2016

Case between Fasil Mohammed Ali-C.P. vs Abdul Rasheed regarding dishonour of cheque

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Judge
Smt. Vincy T.V.
Order Date
2016-10-28
Duration
Less than a year
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Complainant Fasil Mohammed Ali alleged offence under section 138 of N.I. Act with accused Abdul Rasheed pleading not guilty. The court permitted the complainant to withdraw the complaint, leading to the acquittal of the accused.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court permitted the complainant to withdraw the complaint, resulting in the acquittal of the accused under Section 257 of Cr.P.C.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Defendant acquitted under Section 257 Cr.P.C.
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act
Final Judgment
No
The court permitted the complainant to withdraw the complaint, resulting in the acquittal of the accused under Section 257 of Cr.P.C.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint. In the result, the accused is acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C. His bail bond stands cancelled and he is set at liberty.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Fasil Mohammed Ali-C.P.
Relation
C.P.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Rasheed
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Acquittal
Outcome: Defendant acquitted under Section 257 Cr.P.C.
Description:
Defendant acquitted as complainant permitted to withdraw complaint
Evidence:
The complainant filed a petition seeking permission to withdraw the complaint and having satisfied that there are sufficient grounds for granting permission, the complainant is permitted to withdraw his complaint. In the result, the accused is acquitted u/s. 257 Cr.P.C. His bail bond stands cancelled and he is set at liberty.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Fasil Mohammed Ali-C.P. vs Abdul Rasheed regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Fasil Mohammed Ali-C.P. vs Abdul Rasheed regarding dishonour of cheque

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 10/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Mon, 10/31/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abdul Khader vs Abdul Hameed regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Plaintiff Won
Case between Rahiyanath vs Nahmarali regarding Cheque Dishonour
Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Noushad Ali. K. vs Fasal. A. P regarding Cheque Dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won
Case between Abdel Sathar vs C.P. Abdul Hameed regarding Cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Unknown
Case between V.P. Santhosh vs Sunil Kumar regarding dishonoured cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Defendant Won