Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 116 OF 2016

Case between Erachampatt Malik et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding Rent Control Petition

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROL OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-17
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Erachampatt Malik and Erachampatt Haleema filed a rent control petition against M.Sreenivasan. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of one petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition with cost, as one of the petitioners was absent and not ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Petition is dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Erachampatt Malik (36 years) Erachampatt House, Tirur amsom desom, P.O.Pookkayil Bazar, PIN – 676 107. Erachampatt Haleema (55 years) Cheriyamundam amsom desom, Thalakkadathur.P.O. PIN – 676 103, Tirur Taluk.

Defendants

M.Sreenivasan (58 years) Machalil House, Thalakkad amsom Mangattiri desom & Post, Tirur Taluk. PIN – 676 105.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed with cost.
Evidence:
Petition is dismissed with cost.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases