Case Summary
Erachampatt Malik and Erachampatt Haleema filed a rent control petition against M.Sreenivasan. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of one petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition with cost, as one of the petitioners was absent and not ready for evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not available.
Judgment Evidence:
Petition is dismissed with cost.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Erachampatt Malik
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Erachampatt Haleema
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.Sreenivasan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P.P.Basheer
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.I.V.Rethish
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S.Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The petition was dismissed with cost.
Evidence:
Petition is dismissed with cost.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Erachampatt Malik et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding Rent Control Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Erachampatt Malik et al vs M.Sreenivasan regarding Rent Control Petition