Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.221/2023

Case between Epsilon Diagnostics vs Sri. Balasubramanian regarding realization of money

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-10-22
Duration
approximately-1 year 3 months
Case Code No.
221
Case Closed
Tue, 10/22/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Epsilon Diagnostics filed a restoration petition after their original suit was dismissed for default due to non-payment of court fees. The defendant, Sri. Balasubramanian, was set ex parte for failing to appear.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The restoration petition was dismissed by the court, as the court found that it lacked the inherent power to restore a suit rejected for non-payment of court fees.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The restoration petition was dismissed by the court, as the court found that it lacked the inherent power to restore a suit rejected for non-payment of court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Court's jurisdiction for restoration under S. 151 of CPC is limited when an alternative remedy of appeal exists.
Why Defendant Won:
Court's jurisdiction for restoration under S. 151 of CPC is limited when an alternative remedy of appeal exists.
Supporting Evidence
It is well settled principle that the remedy for rejection of plaint is to file an appeal...

Judgment Evidence:

In the result petition is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Epsilon Diagnostics
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sri. Balasubramanian
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R Muraleedharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dr. Anies George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Petition to restore the suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
this court is not inclined to allow this petition. In the result petition is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 10/22/2024 - 12:00
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won