Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 390/2021

Case between The Employees’ Provident Fund Organization vs Vishnu Sahu et al regarding recovery of money

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-21
Duration
approximately-5 years 0 days
Case Closed
Mon, 07/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Employees’ Provident Fund Organization filed a suit to recover Rs 2,53,980 that was mistakenly credited to the account of the 1st defendant instead of its panel advocate. Despite acknowledgments and legal notices, the amount remains unpaid.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff for recovery of the amount along with interest. The 1st defendant is ordered to repay the wrongly credited amount.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs 2,53,980 together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff for recovery of the amount along with interest. The 1st defendant is ordered to repay the wrongly credited amount.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff has succeeded in proving its case with sufficient evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff has succeeded in proving its case with sufficient evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has succeeded in proving his case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (i) The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs 2,53,980 together with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization from the 1st defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Employees’ Provident Fund Organization
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vishnu Sahu
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The State Bank of India
Relation
represented by its Branch Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Branch Manager
Plaintiffs Documents
Extract of Account Ledger of SBI, Kollam Branch, Office copy of letter dated 12/11/2020, Office copy of letter dated 20/11/2020, Legal Notice dated 26/11/2020, Affidavit of the first defendant dated 31/08/2021.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ahees.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Benoy Bal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the wrongly credited amount.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (i) The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs 2,53,980/- together with interest.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Extract of Account Ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Account details related to the disputed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Office copy of letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communication sent to the 2nd defendant regarding the credit error.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Office copy of letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communication sent to the 3rd defendant regarding the credit error.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response from the 3rd defendant to the 1st defendant regarding the credit error.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further communication from the 3rd defendant to the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice regarding the claim for repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Office copy of letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communication sent to the 1st defendant from the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Office copy of letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further communication to the 1st defendant about the credit error.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Extract of Account Ledger
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details of the account maintained by the plaintiff organization.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Affidavit of the first defendant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Admission of receipt of funds by the 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between The Employees’ Provident Fund Organization vs Vishnu Sahu et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between The Employees’ Provident Fund Organization vs Vishnu Sahu et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 07/21/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 07/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Nelson.A. vs Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India, Keralapuram Branch vs Deepu.S.S regarding Realisation of Money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Punjab National Bank vs M/s Cafe Diaries et al regarding realization of money
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India, Ernakulam Branch represented by its Chief Manager, Jayesh P vs Thereesa et al regarding realization of money
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Mohammed Mavadigothi regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won