Case Summary
The plaintiffs include Eliyamma, Devasiachan I.D., and Elizabeth I.D. Devasia. The case was about a legal suit that was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs and lack of evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and unpreparedness to present evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not file proof affidavit.
The plaintiff was absent and did not file proof affidavit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not file proof affidavit.
The plaintiff was absent and did not file proof affidavit.
Supporting Evidence
Proof affidavit not filed. Plaintiff not ready for evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Eliyamma
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Devasiachan I.D.
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Elizabeth I.D. Devasia
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu
- Party Age
- 50
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Siby Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.R. Aravindaksha Menon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Eliyamma et al vs Babu regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Eliyamma et al vs Babu regarding default dismissal