Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 236/2016

Case between Edarikode service sahakarana bank vs Varikodan Kareem and Veluthedath Parambil Subramanian regarding loan satisfaction

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-09-28
Duration
0 years, 10 months, 26 days
Case Code No.
236
Case Closed
Thu, 09/28/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Edarikode service sahakarana bank filed a case against Varikodan Kareem and Veluthedath Parambil Subramanian seeking loan repayment, which was reported as closed, leading to full satisfaction recorded and the case being closed.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court recorded full satisfaction as the loan was reported closed, leading to the case being closed.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Full satisfaction recorded
Case Type
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery
Final Judgment
No
The court recorded full satisfaction as the loan was reported closed, leading to the case being closed.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

It is reported that loan is closed. Petitioner endorsed that fact on arrest warrant. Hence full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Edarikode service sahakarana bank
Party Age
1
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Varikodan Kareem
Party Age
48
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Veluthedath Parambil Subramanian
Party Age
45
Plaintiffs Documents
Endorsed fact on arrest warrant
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.P.Basheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Varikodan Kareem
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for 2
Appearance Type
Unknown

Reliefs

Relief Type: Unknown
Outcome: Full satisfaction recorded
Description:
Loan closure reported leading to full satisfaction
Evidence:
It is reported that loan is closed. Petitioner endorsed that fact on arrest warrant. Hence full satisfaction recorded. EP closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 11/16/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 09/28/2017 - 12:00
From
Fri, 09/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 09/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Manikandan et al regarding loan default
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M.Gopalakrishnan regarding loan recovery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery Dismissed
Case between Canara Bank vs C. Prakashan.C et al regarding loan recovery
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Manoj.K et al regarding loan recovery
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Haneefa.P regarding loan default
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery Plaintiff Won