Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 115 OF 2016

Case between Canara Bank vs C. Prakashan.C et al regarding loan recovery

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-01-27
Duration
Less than one year
Case Closed
Fri, 01/27/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendants seeking recovery of a loan amount due for higher education. The defendants, a husband and wife, failed to repay the loan despite several demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendants pay an amount to the plaintiff Bank with interest and costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of loan amount with interest and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendants pay an amount to the plaintiff Bank with interest and costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's evidence remained unchallenged, and the defendants failed to set up any defense.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's evidence remained unchallenged, and the defendants failed to set up any defense.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff made several demands to the defendants for payment of the money due and settlement of accounts, including sending registered notice, but the defendants failed to remit the amounts due to the plaintiff bank.

Judgment Evidence:

The defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs. 2,60,747/- (Rupees Two lakhs sixty thousand seven hundred and forty-seven only) with interest at the rate of 11.5% per annum on Rs. 2,59,990/- (Rupees Two lakhs fifty-nine thousand nine hundred and ninety only) from the date of suit till the date of realization and costs of the suit.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C. Prakashan.C
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o. Kelu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radha.A
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o. Prakashan.C
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application, Loan Sanction Memorandum, Education Loan Agreement, Undertaking Letter, Agreement, Letter, Acknowledgment of Debt and Security, True copy of statement of accounts.
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.M. Venugopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Sreekala.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sabu.K.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery of loan amount with interest and costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court decreed the defendants to pay an amount to the plaintiff Bank with interest and costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs. 2,60,747/- (Rupees Two lakhs sixty thousand seven hundred and forty-seven only) with interest at the rate of 11.5% per annum on Rs. 2,59,990/- (Rupees Two lakhs fifty-nine thousand nine hundred and ninety only) from the date of suit till the date of realization and costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Education Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
A3
Document Type: Undertaking Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
A4
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
A5
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
A9
Document Type: True Copy of Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the plaintiff's evidence.
Reference:
A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Loan Recovery
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs C. Prakashan.C et al regarding loan recovery
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs C. Prakashan.C et al regarding loan recovery

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/27/2017 - 12:00
From
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Tue, 01/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Manikandan et al regarding loan default
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs M.Gopalakrishnan regarding loan recovery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery Dismissed
Case between Canara Bank vs Manoj.K et al regarding loan recovery
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Haneefa.P regarding loan default
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sajid et al regarding loan recovery
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery Plaintiff Won