Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 4/2022

Case between Dr. Paul. K. Chandy et al vs K.V. Shiraz regarding eviction of tenant

Court
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Indu P Raj
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration
approximately-3 years 9 months
Case Closed
Fri, 10/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Dr. Paul K. Chandy and Dr. Ittiyerah P. Chandy, are landlords seeking to evict the respondent, K.V. Shiraz, from the petition schedule premises due to non-payment of rent. The petitioners claim a bona fide requirement for their own occupation as the first petitioner wishes to start a clinical laboratory.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the eviction of the respondent, K.V. Shiraz, from the petition schedule building due to willful default in rent payment and a bona fide requirement for own occupation by the petitioners.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule building and payment of rent arrears.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the eviction of the respondent, K.V. Shiraz, from the petition schedule building due to willful default in rent payment and a bona fide requirement for own occupation by the petitioners.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners provided sufficient evidence of rent default and a genuine need for the property for personal use.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The first petitioner’s medical background, licence, and physical disability (leg amputation due to diabetes) clearly prove a genuine and reasonable need to start a small clinic near his residence for livelihood.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, it is ordered as follows: 1. The respondent is directed to vacate and surrender vacant possession of the petition-schedule building to the petitioners within 4 weeks from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Paul. K. Chandy
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Ittiyerah. P. Chandy
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.V. Shiraz
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Lease Deed No. 220/2009, Sale Deed No. 491/2009, Lawyer Notice dated 15-01-2022
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.V. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajeev. P. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Reji George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court ordered the respondent to vacate the petition-schedule building.
Evidence:
The respondent is directed to vacate and surrender vacant possession of the petition-schedule building to the petitioners within 4 weeks from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court ordered the respondent to pay the arrears of rent due to the petitioners.
Evidence:
The respondent shall pay the entire arrears of rent due to the petitioners up to the date of delivery of possession, as determined in accordance with the rent deed Exhibit A1.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court established the tenancy and rent obligations based on the lease deed.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court referenced the sale deed for the assignment of rights over the petition schedule building.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced evidence of ownership and tax compliance.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice established arrears of rent due from the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served as evidence of sending the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirmed receipt of the lawyer's notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Referenced earlier proceedings as part of the court's deliberation.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Dr. Paul. K. Chandy et al vs K.V. Shiraz regarding eviction of tenant
Case Code Year
Case between Dr. Paul. K. Chandy et al vs K.V. Shiraz regarding eviction of tenant

Quick Facts

Location
KOTTAYAM
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Tue, 03/22/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Jose Mathew vs Shafi Kurumpelil regarding eviction for arrears of rent.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between T V Varghese et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding eviction from rented property
Principal Rent Controller
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between J.Jayaparvathy Ammal vs Shiny Kamal regarding eviction of tenant
COURT OF THE RENT CONTROLLER, KOTTAYAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kurian Abraham et al vs Binu P Mani regarding eviction from a rented property
THE RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Church Of South India Trust Association vs Smt. Biji Aji regarding recovery of possession of rented property.
Court Of The Rent Controller
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won