Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 248/2022

Case between Dr. Kingsley Ayyankutty et al vs Binu Joseph regarding Review Petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-10-25
Duration
Case Code No.
248
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Dr. Kingsley Ayyankutty and Dr. Surya Kingsley filed a review petition against Binu Joseph. The court addressed the petition related to the suit's status and court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was restored after being rejected for non-payment of court fees. The delay in payment was condoned.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The suit was restored after being rejected for non-payment of court fees. The delay in payment was condoned.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court allowed the I.A and restored the suit for the interest of justice.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court allowed the I.A and restored the suit for the interest of justice.
Supporting Evidence
The court allowed the I.A and restored the suit in the interest of justice.

Judgment Evidence:

Heard. Suit is rejected for non payment of balance court fee. Balance court fee is paid. I.A 8/2025 is allowed (vide separate order). Delay is condoned. The suit is restored on the file of the court. In the interest of justice.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Kingsley Ayyankutty
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dr. Surya Kingsley
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Binu Joseph
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Justin David
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Muhammed Haris K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Sabitha G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is restored on the file of the court.
Evidence:
Suit is rejected for non payment of balance court fee. Balance court fee is paid. I.A 8/2025 is allowed (vide separate order). Delay is condoned. The suit is restored on the file of the court.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally Taluk, Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.J. Joseph vs Marykutty Varghese et al regarding Review Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Chandrika vs Ancy Mariam Kurian regarding Review Petition
Additional Rent Control Court
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between A.T Thomas vs Z. Scaria et al regarding review of judgment and decree rejecting the plaint.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between M B Ushakumariamma vs The Kottayam Wholesale Co Operative Consumer’s Stores Ltd. regarding Review Petition
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Review Petition Unknown
Case between Allianz Finance Corporation vs Biju K R regarding Review Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Review Petition Defendant Won