Case Summary
Petitioner Damodharan filed for restoration of petition, which was allowed by the court setting aside the previous decree.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of petition
Case Type
Civil Case - Petition Restoration
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration of the petition and set aside the previous decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Cost paid petition is allowed. Decree dated 4-3-2015 is set aside vide order in IA 1128/15.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Damodharan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yahu Haji
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P.Praveen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S.Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of petition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoration of the petition and setting aside of the previous decree
Evidence:
Cost paid petition is allowed. Decree dated 4-3-2015 is set aside vide order in IA 1128/15.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Case - Petition Restoration
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2015