Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S.No. 945 /2021

Case between D Suresh vs Latha Saseendhra Shenoy et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-10-23
Duration
approximately-3 years 21 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

D Suresh, the petitioner, seeks a declaration and permanent injunction against Latha Saseendhra Shenoy and others, claiming they are interfering with his possession of certain properties. The court found the petition valid, as the suit was undervalued and required return for filing in the appropriate jurisdiction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition to return the plaint was allowed, as the court found it was undervalued and thus lacked jurisdiction. The plaint will be returned for re-filing in the appropriate court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaint is ordered to be returned to plaintiff for instituting the same before the Hon’ble Sub court, Ernakulam having jurisdiction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the valuation of the suit was consistent with legal principles and indicated that the jurisdictional amount was correctly determined.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition is allowed. 1) Plaint is ordered to be returned to plaintiff for instituting the same before the Hon’ble Sub court, Ernakulam having jurisdiction.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

D Suresh (54 years) Pulinjimoottil House, Kadungamangalam, Chottanikkara

Defendants

Latha Saseendhra Shenoy (59 years) Edavazhikkal Shankar Nivas, Elamakkara P O. Maya Varma (58 years) Vishnukripa, Near Kalikota Palace, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk. Dileep Varma (65 years) Vishnukripa, Near Kalikota Palace, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Return of the plaint
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaint is ordered to be returned to plaintiff for instituting the same before the Hon’ble Sub court, Ernakulam having jurisdiction.
Evidence:
In the result, Petition is allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sat, 10/02/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases