Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
S.T. No:51/2016

Case between C.Krishnan kutty vs Koyakutty regarding dishonour of cheque

Court
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Judge
Smt. Vincy T.V.
Order Date
2017-10-30
Duration
1 year, 5 months, 8 days
Case Closed
Mon, 10/30/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Complaint filed against the accused for dishonour of cheque issued towards repayment of a loan, resulting in conviction under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The accused was found guilty of dishonouring a cheque and sentenced to imprisonment till the court rises, along with a compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 to the complainant under section 357(3) of Cr.P.C.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 and imprisonment
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour (Section 138 N.I. Act)
Final Judgment
No
The accused was found guilty of dishonouring a cheque and sentenced to imprisonment till the court rises, along with a compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 to the complainant under section 357(3) of Cr.P.C.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The complainant successfully proved that the accused issued a cheque towards a legally enforceable debt of Rs. 2,00,000 and failed to pay within the statutory period, resulting in conviction under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The complainant successfully proved that the accused issued a cheque towards a legally enforceable debt of Rs. 2,00,000 and failed to pay within the statutory period, resulting in conviction under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
Supporting Evidence
The complainant successfully established that the accused executed and issued Ext. P1 cheque in discharge of legally enforceable debt of Rs.2,00,000/- to the complainant...

Judgment Evidence:

In the result 1 the accused is found guilty and ... sentenced to undergo imprisonment till the raising of the court and is directed to pay compensation of Rs. 2,00,000/- to the complainant u/s 357(3) of the Cr.P.C. In default of payment of compensation, the accused shall undergo simple imprisonment for 1 month.

Parties Involved

Parties

Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Complainant
Advocate Name
Sri. KK Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Accused
Advocate Name
Bindhu Advocate
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Compensation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Compensation of Rs. 2,00,000 to the complainant under section 357(3) of Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
Relief Type: Imprisonment
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Imprisonment till the court rises.
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Complainant
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the accused towards the repayment of Rs. 2,00,000 loan.
Reference:
Ext.P1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Complainant
Relevance:
Notice regarding dishonour of cheque and demand for repayment.
Reference:
Ext.P4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Complainant
Relevance:
Related to communication with the accused.
Reference:
Ext.P5

Case Classification

Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour (Section 138 N.I. Act)
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between C.Krishnan kutty vs Koyakutty regarding dishonour of cheque
Case Code Year
Case between C.Krishnan kutty vs Koyakutty regarding dishonour of cheque

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Imprisonment Involved
Arrest Involved
Nature of Cheque Case
Imprisonment Duration
1 month

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 05/22/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/30/2017 - 12:00
From
Sun, 10/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Tue, 10/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ashraf vs Shahida regarding Cheque Dishonour
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act Prosecution
Case between Mujeeb Rahman. K. K. vs Abdul Rasheed. V. regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdul Khader vs Abdul Hameed regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate -II
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 of N.I. Act Plaintiff Won
Case between Aboobacker vs Muhammed Kutty Haji regarding cheque dishonour
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate-II
Cheque Dishonour Case Defendant Won
Case between Indira vs Sreeja S regarding dishonour of cheque
Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate - II, Tirur
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour Defendant Won