Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 433/2018

Case between Chocolates Collections vs Shahul C. Jamal regarding realization of money

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-31
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Chocolates Collections, is seeking to recover money owed by the defendant, Shahul C. Jamal, due to a dishonored cheque. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has sufficient means to pay but is evading the payment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the amount owed by the defendant. The plaintiff is entitled to a total of Rs. 3,20,600 along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 3,20,600 from the defendant with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the case with unchallenged oral testimony and documentary evidence, establishing the debt owed by the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs of the plaintiff as follows. The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs. 3,20,600 from the defendant...

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Chocolates Collections (Age not specified years) Opposite Central Juma Masjid, 40/3493, Jew Street, Kochi - 682031 Geo. K. George (32 years) Kolady house Chattukulam, Chittanoor P.O., Kunnamkulam Thrissur - 680 523

Defendants

Shahul C. Jamal (30 years) Valiyaveetil House, Poonjar Thekkekkara Village, Thekkekkara Muri, Erattupetta P.O., Kottayam – 686 121

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs. 3,20,600 from the defendant.
Evidence:
In these circumstances, having considered the oral testimony of PW1 and Ext. A1 to A6, the plaintiff has proved his case before the court and therefore, he is entitled to get a decree as he prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Invoices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court used these invoices to substantiate the claim of amounts owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1 series
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cheque was issued by the defendant to pay off the debt but was returned unpaid due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo indicated that Ext.A2 cheque was dishonoured for insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendant after the cheque was dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt shows that the Ext.A4 lawyer notice was dispatched.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Unserved Postal Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This cover relates to the unserved lawyer notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 03/27/2018 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases