Case Summary
The petitioners are CHIRAPRATH PRASANTHAN and DINESAN. K, who filed a rent control petition against the respondent JISHNU. P. K. The petition has been closed after the respondent surrendered the key of the scheduled shop room.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has closed the petition after the respondent surrendered the key of the shop room.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence RCP is closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- CHIRAPRATH PRASANTHAN
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- DINESAN. K
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- JISHNU. P. K
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.K. Anilraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V. K. Santhoshkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Anunanda. P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sijith. M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between CHIRAPRATH PRASANTHAN et al vs JISHNU. P. K regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between CHIRAPRATH PRASANTHAN et al vs JISHNU. P. K regarding Rent Control