Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restoration Petition 1194/2018

Case between Chathamponnath Prasanna vs Ramachandran @ Kunhamani regarding restoration of petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Judge
Smt. Nimmi K.K.
Order Date
2019-03-15
Duration
0 years, 11 months, 24 days
Case Closed
Fri, 03/15/2019 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chathamponnath Prasanna filed a restoration petition against Ramachandran @ Kunhamani. The petition was allowed by the court after considering the reasons for non-appearance and the documents submitted.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the restoration petition after evaluating the reasons for non-appearance. Costs were set for payment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2000
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition after evaluating the reasons for non-appearance. Costs were set for payment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found satisfactory reasons stated in the petition for the non-appearance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found satisfactory reasons stated in the petition for the non-appearance.
Supporting Evidence
The reasons stated in the petition and the documents produced are satisfactory for the non appearance of the petitions.

Judgment Evidence:

I am satisfied that the reasons stated in the petition and the documents produced are satisfactory for the non appearance of the petitions. Hence petition stands allowed on payment of Costs of Rs.2000/- for payment of costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chathamponnath Prasanna
Party Age
1
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramachandran @ Kunhamani
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Suresh A Alingal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration petition allowed on payment of costs.
Evidence:
IA.101/2019 is allowed. I am satisfied that the reasons stated in the petition and the documents produced are satisfactory for the non appearance of the petitions.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Chathamponnath Prasanna vs Ramachandran @ Kunhamani regarding restoration of petition
Case Code Year
Case between Chathamponnath Prasanna vs Ramachandran @ Kunhamani regarding restoration of petition

Quick Facts

Location
Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Fri, 04/13/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 03/15/2019 - 12:00
From
Fri, 03/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Illimoottil Herold Dayas vs Isaq Pandarapa et al regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mohanan vs Pottammal Narayanan Ezhuthachan et al regarding restoration application
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Nisar vs Thamikutty regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kunheethu vs Hassasn Haji regarding restoration petition
Munsiff Magistrate AT Tirur
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kunheen vs C. Abdul Salam regarding Restoration Petition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Restoration Petition Unknown