Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 37 OF 2015

Case between Changampally Padinharethil Moideenkutty Gurikkal et al vs Edakkad Abu regarding eviction compensation

Court
Rent Controller of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-06-07
Duration
2 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners sought eviction compensation and reached a compromise with the respondent to pay Rs. 2,00,000 in total, with Rs. 1,50,000 already paid.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the rent control petition based on the compromise terms, with the petitioner paying eviction compensation to the respondent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction compensation payment as per compromise terms
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of promise is lawful the terms here by recorded. Hence rent control petition is allowed as per the terms of compromise without any costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Changampally Padinharethil Moideenkutty Gurikkal (47 years) Thirunnavaya amom Edakkulam desom, Tirur Taluk Kannanchath Valappil Koyamon (48 years) Thavannur amsom desom, Ponnani Taluk Keezhedathil Sidheekh (47 years) Tirur amsom Kott desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Edakkad Abu (Age not specified years) Thrikkandiyur amsom desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction Compensation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioner to pay Rs. 2,00,000 in total towards eviction compensation with a payment of Rs. 1,50,000 already made.
Evidence:
Since the terms of promise is lawful the terms here by recorded. Hence rent control petition is allowed as per the terms of compromise without any costs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sun, 06/07/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases