RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 37 OF 2015

Case between Changampally Padinharethil Moideenkutty Gurikkal et al vs Edakkad Abu regarding eviction compensation

Court

Rent Controller of Tirur

Judge

Smt. VINCY.T.V.

Order Date

2018-06-07

Duration

2 years

Case Closed

Thu, 06/07/2018 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners sought eviction compensation and reached a compromise with the respondent to pay Rs. 2,00,000 in total, with Rs. 1,50,000 already paid.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court allowed the rent control petition based on the compromise terms, with the petitioner paying eviction compensation to the respondent.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Eviction compensation payment as per compromise terms

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court allowed the rent control petition based on the compromise terms, with the petitioner paying eviction compensation to the respondent.

Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of promise is lawful the terms here by recorded. Hence rent control petition is allowed as per the terms of compromise without any costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Changampally Padinharethil Moideenkutty Gurikkal
Party Age: 47
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kannanchath Valappil Koyamon
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Keezhedathil Sidheekh
Party Age: 47
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Edakkad Abu

Plaintiffs Documents

Unknown

Defendants Documents

Unknown

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction Compensation

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Petitioner to pay Rs. 2,00,000 in total towards eviction compensation with a payment of Rs. 1,50,000 already made.

Evidence: