Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 234 OF 2016

Case between Chakku vs Krishnan et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2018-08-31
Duration
2 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chakku filed a suit seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from entering his property, causing damage to trees, taking soil, and demolishing the compound wall.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the permanent prohibitory injunction requested by the plaintiff against the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Suit decreed as Permanent Prohibitory Injunction against the defendants.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Chakku (68 years) Koyattil House, Ozhur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Krishnan (70 years) Thandam veettil House, Thanalur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Dinesan (35 years) Thandamveetil House, Thanalur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Ganesan (32 years) Thandamveettil House, Thanalur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk Babu (30 years) Thandamveettil House, Thanalur amsom, desom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restrained defendants from entering the property, causing damage to trees, taking soil, and demolishing the compound wall.
Evidence:
The plaintiff's case is proved from the plaint, affidavit, and from the documents.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Ossyath Adharam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Certified copy of Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting document for the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submission by Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
C1
Document Type: Commission Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Submission by Advocate Commissioner.
Reference:
C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Thu, 08/04/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases