Case Summary
Two plaintiffs sought permanent prohibitory injunction against two defendants regarding a property matter. The case was dismissed as the matter was settled between the parties.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiffs
Relief Granted
Not Decided
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent prohibitory injunction
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed as the matter was settled between the parties.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Punnasseri Krishanankutty
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o. Velukutty
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Punnasseri Mini
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- W/o. Punnasseri Krishnankutty
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Padath Peediyekkal Sainudheen
- Party Age
- 35
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mandante Purakkal Raziya
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- W/o. Padathupeediyekkal Sainudheen
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking permanent prohibitory injunction
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Punnasseri Krishanankutty et al vs Padath Peediyekkal Sainudheen et al regarding permanent injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Punnasseri Krishanankutty et al vs Padath Peediyekkal Sainudheen et al regarding permanent injunction