Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.807/2018

Case between Celestin Cletus vs Antony Francis, Alexander Francis regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-06
Duration
Case Code No.
807
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Celestin Cletus as the plaintiff and Antony Francis and Alexander Francis as defendants. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and the failure to file proof affidavit and documents. The plaintiff had no representation at the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and the failure to file proof affidavit and documents. The plaintiff had no representation at the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Celestin Cletus
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Antony Francis
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Alexander Francis
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.P. Santhosh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anju Jahafer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.V. Binod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2018

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Rahath Hakkeem vs Rajani Sreekumar regarding mandatory injunction
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ajay Kumar Gupta et al vs Shajan Joseph.K.R. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Smt. Baby Ravi vs Sajini Nandakumar regarding realization of money
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Metadata Technologies vs M/s. Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. regarding suit not pressed.
II Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V P Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding restoration of suit
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won