Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No . 1322/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs Sri. Nibu A.N regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is seeking to recover money owed by Sri. Nibu A.N due to a loan that was not repaid. The court found in favor of Canara Bank based on the evidence presented.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, Canara Bank, with the defendant ordered to pay an amount of ₹4,57,513.69 along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay the plaintiff ₹4,57,513.69 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 4,57,513.69/- (Rupees four lakh fifty seven thousand five hundred and thirteen and sixty nine paise only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank, Kalamasserry Branch (Age not specified years) Woodlands Annex, Eloor Road, North Kalamasserry, Ernakulam - 683 104

Defendants

Sri. Nibu A.N (36 years) Ampanattu House, Muppathadam, Kadungalloor, Aluva Pin - 683 110

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of the amount due from the defendant.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the same from the defendant, with interest from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff granted costs of the suit.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application to credit facilities to Micro and Small Enterprises
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document submitted to support the loan application.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicating approval of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document outlining the borrower's commitments.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Composite Hypothication Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement regarding the collateral for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the borrower's promise to pay.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the defendant acknowledged the owed amount.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further acknowledgment of debt by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document affirming debt and the security provided.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Computer print out of Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement detailing transactions related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendant regarding the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirmation of receipt of documents sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt for postal correspondence related to the suit.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases