Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 887/2019

Case between Canara Bank vs Smt. Leena Bhavani regarding default dismissal

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Plaintiff, Canara Bank, was absent with no representation during the hearing. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the Plaintiff's failure to take required steps for affixing summons.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the Plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank (Age not specified years) High Court Branch, Ground Floor, KHCAA Chamber Complex, High Court P.O., Ernakulam­682 031.

Defendants

Smt. Leena Bhavani (41 years years) 18/1981 A, Kavunkal House, ESI Road, Palluruthy, Ernakulam­682006.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases