Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 94 OF 2018

Case between Canara Bank vs Shiba Garments et al regarding realization of money

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-10-23
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Shiba Garments and its partners for defaulting on loan repayments. The court found the defendants liable for the amount owed to the bank.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the amount claimed due to the defendants' failure to repay the loan.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay Rs. 6,44,173/- with interest and costs to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the amount claimed due to the defendants' failure to repay the loan.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided reliable evidence proving the defendants' liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided reliable evidence proving the defendants' liability.
Supporting Evidence
Since the defendant remained ex parte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW.1. Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. Defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs. 6,44,173/- (Rupees Six Lakh Forty Four Thousand One Hundred and Seventy Three only) with interest @ 11.70% per annum from the date of suit till its realization, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiba Garments
Relation
Rep. By Managing Partner
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noushad Ali
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o Muhammedkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noushad Ali
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o Muhammedkutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saifunnisa.T.
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o Kasim.M.M.
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 17.06.2015, Sanction Memorandum dated 17.06.2015, Composite Loan Agreement, Guarantee Agreements, copy of registered Lawyer Notice, statement of accounts showing the details of the loan transaction.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.M.Venugopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sreekala.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Vinida.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff requested the recovery of Rs. 6,44,173/- with interest.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs. 6,44,173/- (Rupees Six Lakh Forty Four Thousand One Hundred and Seventy Three only) with interest @ 11.70% per annum from the date of suit till its realization, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff was granted costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan application dated 17.06.2015 was used to establish the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Sanction Memorandum dated 17.06.2015 was relevant to the loan's approval.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Composite Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Composite Loan Agreement dated 17.06.2015 established the terms of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The Guarantee Agreement with Guarantee Covering Letter dated 17.06.2015 outlined the obligation to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another Guarantee Agreement with Guarantee Covering Letter dated 17.06.2015 was also part of the evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Registered Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The copy of the registered Lawyer Notice dated 10.01.2018 was submitted as part of the evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The statement of accounts showing the details of the loan transaction was provided to support the claim.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Shiba Garments et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Shiba Garments et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Pushpa.M.V. regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Shahul Hameed regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Mahesh kumar.P.P. regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sabira et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shihabudheen et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed