Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 834/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs Roayal Hostel et al regarding suit rejected due to non-payment of court fee.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff and Roayal Hostel along with Girija Radhakrishnan as defendants. The court rejected the suit as the plaintiff failed to pay the court fee despite multiple chances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ruled that the plaintiff's suit was rejected due to the non-payment of court fees despite being given several chances.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to comply with court requirements regarding payment of fees.

Judgment Evidence:

Due to non payment of court fee despite numerous chances and posting as last chance, no further time, suit rejected.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank (Age not specified years) Edappally Branch Asari Parambu Road, Ponekkara, Edappally, Edappally village, Kerala - 682 032

Defendants

Roayal Hostel (Age not specified years) Radiantal Apartment, 3rd Cross, Roma flat, Sea Port Air port Road, Cochin University P.O, Ernakulam – 682 022 Girija Radhakrishnan (Age not specified years) Flat No. 1A First Floor, Regal Royal Apartment, Near Jawaharlal Nehru International Stadium Kaloor, Kochi – 682 017

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to non payment of court fee despite numerous chances.
Evidence:
Due to non payment of court fee despite numerous chances and posting as last chance no further time, suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases