Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 834/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs Roayal Hostel et al regarding suit rejected due to non-payment of court fee.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff and Roayal Hostel along with Girija Radhakrishnan as defendants. The court rejected the suit as the plaintiff failed to pay the court fee despite multiple chances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court ruled that the plaintiff's suit was rejected due to the non-payment of court fees despite being given several chances.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled that the plaintiff's suit was rejected due to the non-payment of court fees despite being given several chances.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to comply with court requirements regarding payment of fees.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to comply with court requirements regarding payment of fees.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff did not pay the required court fee despite multiple opportunities.

Judgment Evidence:

Due to non payment of court fee despite numerous chances and posting as last chance, no further time, suit rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by its Branch Manager, Sri. Keegan Joe Francis
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roayal Hostel
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Girija Radhakrishnan
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Ramesh (Vaikom)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kavya P. Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to non payment of court fee despite numerous chances.
Evidence:
Due to non payment of court fee despite numerous chances and posting as last chance no further time, suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of court fee
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Roayal Hostel et al regarding suit rejected due to non-payment of court fee.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Roayal Hostel et al regarding suit rejected due to non-payment of court fee.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won