Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 168 OF 2018

Case between Canara Bank vs Rajesh.T.P., Ammini, Rajiv, Rajan et al regarding realisation of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-08-31
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against several defendants for the recovery of a loan amount of Rs.5,59,585/- which was defaulted. The loan was initially taken by the first defendant and his father for educational purposes.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decree confirms that the plaintiff bank is entitled to recover the loan amount along with interest. The defendants did not contest the case effectively.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.5,59,585/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of suit till its realization
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decree confirms that the plaintiff bank is entitled to recover the loan amount along with interest. The defendants did not contest the case effectively.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved their case through cogent and reliable evidence as the defendants did not contest the claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved their case through cogent and reliable evidence as the defendants did not contest the claims.
Supporting Evidence
Since the defendants No.1,2,3 & 5 did not file written statement and others opted to remain exparte, the evidence adduced by the plaintiff remained unchallenged. I find no reason to disbelieve PW.1. Therefore, I am satisfied that the plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. I.Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.5,59,585/- (Rupees Five Lakh fifty Nine Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty Five only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum thereon from the date of suit till its realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh.T.P.
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ammini
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajiv
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajan
Party Age
41
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leela
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application dated 20.11.2006, Sanction Memorandum dated 2.12.2006, Educational Loan Agreement dated 2.12.2006, Acknowledgement of Debt and Security dated 25.07.2014, Acknowledgement of Debt and Security dated 24.07.2015
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C.M.Venugopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Sreekala.K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Vinida.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.C.P.Jamshid Rahman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Aneesa.C.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's request to recover an amount of Rs.5,59,585/- with interest.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is decreed as follows. I.Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.5,59,585/- (Rupees Five Lakh fifty Nine Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty Five only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum thereon from the date of suit till its realization.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's entitlement to recover costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
IIPlaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from the defendants at confessional scale.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the application for the loan made by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the approval of the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Educational Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement outlining the terms of the educational loan provided to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgement of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents acknowledging the debt and the security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4 & A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajesh.T.P., Ammini, Rajiv, Rajan et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajesh.T.P., Ammini, Rajiv, Rajan et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 08/01/2019 - 12:00
To
Sat, 08/31/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Pushpa.M.V. regarding Suit for realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Shahul Hameed regarding money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Mahesh kumar.P.P. regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sabira et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Shihabudheen et al regarding money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Civil Suit Dismissed