Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 322/2025

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Shudham Curry Powder and Pickles regarding realisation of money.

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-08-02
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendants for non-repayment of a loan. The court found that the defendants owed a total amount of ₹6,18,140 to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, requiring defendants to pay ₹6,18,140 with interest. The court confirmed the plaintiff's case based on uncontested evidence.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to pay ₹6,18,140 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, requiring defendants to pay ₹6,18,140 with interest. The court confirmed the plaintiff's case based on uncontested evidence.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff was uncontested and established the defendants' liability.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of the plaintiff was uncontested and established the defendants' liability.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹6,18,140/- (Rupees six lakhs eighteen thousand one hundred and forty only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendants or from assets of defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rashmi
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o. Sri. Prasanth S
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Shudham Curry Powder and Pickles
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr. Yohannan V.C
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o. Chacko
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application Form, Loan Agreement, Acknowledgment of debt & Security, Postal Receipt, Office copy of Lawyer Notice, Computer print out of Statement of Account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.P. B Subramanian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rema Menon R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff an amount of ₹6,18,140/- with interest.
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of ₹6,18,140/- (Rupees six lakhs eighteen thousand one hundred and forty only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendants or from assets of defendants.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to prove the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to prove the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to prove the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to prove the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of Proprietorship
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to prove the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to prove the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment of debt & Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to prove the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment of debt & Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to prove the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Office copy of lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to prove the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to prove the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to prove the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A10(a)
Document Type: Computer print out of Statement of Account for the period from 01.01.2025 to 24.02.2025
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Part of the evidence to demonstrate the outstanding amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A11

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Shudham Curry Powder and Pickles regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. Shudham Curry Powder and Pickles regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won