Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 715/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. PKR Enterprises regarding court fee payment

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-03-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is the plaintiff represented by its Branch Manager, Sri Andani Prasanna B.M. The defendants include M/s. PKR Enterprises represented by Mr. Adithyan P.R. The case revolves around non-payment of balance court fee by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and non-payment of the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to show representation and did not remit balance court fee.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank (Age not specified years) 46/5 Ground Floor, Ayyappankavu West Road Ernakulam, Kochi, Kerala -682016

Defendants

M/s. PKR Enterprises (Age not specified years) Pattarmadam House, Pachalam Ernakulam, 682012 Adithyan P.R. (30 years years) Pattarmadam, Pttakuzhi Cross Road Pachalam, Ernakulam -682012

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for non-payment of balance court fee
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases