Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 715/2024

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. PKR Enterprises regarding court fee payment

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-03-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank is the plaintiff represented by its Branch Manager, Sri Andani Prasanna B.M. The defendants include M/s. PKR Enterprises represented by Mr. Adithyan P.R. The case revolves around non-payment of balance court fee by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and non-payment of the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and non-payment of the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to show representation and did not remit balance court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to show representation and did not remit balance court fee.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff continuously absent and not turning up for evidence also.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. PKR Enterprises
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Adithyan P.R.
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
S. Ramesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kavya P. Prasad
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint rejected for non-payment of balance court fee
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. PKR Enterprises regarding court fee payment
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. PKR Enterprises regarding court fee payment

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won