Case Summary
Canara Bank filed a suit against Mr. Rajish Balan and Mrs. Rakhi S. Nair. The case was rejected due to non-payment of court fees and lack of representation from the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's case due to lack of representation and non-payment of court fees.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence name called, no representation. Plaint is rejected for non-payment of court fees.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Rajish Balan
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mrs. Rakhi. S. Nair
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- E.N. Thankappan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ramu Rajendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K. Pradeepkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Plaint was rejected for non-payment of court fees.
Evidence:
Hence name called, no representation. Plaint is rejected for non-payment of court fees.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Mr. Rajish Balan et al regarding non-payment of court fees
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Mr. Rajish Balan et al regarding non-payment of court fees