Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.1391/2019

Case between The Canara Bank vs Mr. Joseph Jilben regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-04-12
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 months 17 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, The Canara Bank, is seeking repayment of a loan amounting to Rs.1,63,887 from the defendant, Mr. Joseph Jilben, who failed to repay the loan taken for purchasing a vehicle. The case was decided in favor of the plaintiff as the defendant was absent during the trial.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed with costs in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount along with interest from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.1,63,887 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the case through unchallenged oral testimony and documentary evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs of the plaintiff as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.1,63,887 from the defendant with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

The Canara Bank (Age not specified years) Banerji Road Branch, 41/3775 & 3779, Mariyambika Building Banerji Road, Ernakulam, Pin-682018

Defendants

Mr. Joseph Jilben (38 years) Koodarapilly House, Thomaspuram, Maradu Post, Ernakulam, Pin-682 304

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover the outstanding loan amount from the defendant.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed with costs of the plaintiff as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.1,63,887/- (Rupees One lakh sixty three thousand eight hundred and eighty seven only) from the defendant with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter, 6% interest per annum till the date of realization from the defendant and his assets both movable and immovable.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the initial application for the loan availed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the security agreement for the loan provided for the vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter confirms the obligation of the defendant to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter Evidencing Execution of Documents
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the execution of essential documents took place related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement provides the financial details of the defendant's loan account to support the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendant demanding payment of the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Certificate of Loan Papers
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate supports the plaintiff's case regarding the loan transaction.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Particulars of Vehicle Hypothecated
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document specifies the vehicle that was hypothecated as security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Defendant Acknowledgment of Debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the defendant acknowledged the debt owed to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The unchallenged oral testimony of the plaintiff's witness supported the claims made in the suit.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Wed, 10/30/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases