Case Summary
The case involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff represented by its branch manager Thriukumaran and Midhun. A as the defendant. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by Canara Bank was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Midhun. A
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Nikhil.T.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Anaswara.N
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Muhammad Ali.E.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abdul Vahid P.P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Midhun. A regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Midhun. A regarding dismissal of suit