Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 116/2025

Case between Canara Bank vs Fajarudeen K.H regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-11-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendant, Fajarudeen K.H., who failed to make repayments on a car loan. The court found the suit barred by limitation and dismissed the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as it was filed beyond the period of limitation. Since the defendant did not appear, there was no order as to costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed. Considering the fact that the defendant remained exparte to the proceedings, there is no order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank (Age not specified years) Kalamassery Branch, Woodlands Annex Road, North Kalamassery, Ernakulam-683104

Defendants

Fajarudeen K.H (36 years years) Kadappally Moolayil, Changampuzha Nagar P.O, South Kalamassery, Ernakulam-682033

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of the outstanding loan amount of Rs.2,25,111.10/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore issue No.2 is also found against the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan application supports the plaintiff's claim regarding the loan availed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original letter of sanction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The letter of sanction indicates that the plaintiff bank sanctioned the loan to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter is a formal agreement by the defendant to repay the loan under the bank's terms.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original composite hypothecation agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The hypothecation agreement secures the loan against the vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The lawyer's notice is evidence of the plaintiff's attempts to recover the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases