Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 116/2025

Case between Canara Bank vs Fajarudeen K.H regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-11-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendant, Fajarudeen K.H., who failed to make repayments on a car loan. The court found the suit barred by limitation and dismissed the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as it was filed beyond the period of limitation. Since the defendant did not appear, there was no order as to costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as it was filed beyond the period of limitation. Since the defendant did not appear, there was no order as to costs.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed. Considering the fact that the defendant remained exparte to the proceedings, there is no order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fajarudeen K.H
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application dated 13.09.2014, Original letter of sanction dated 15.09.2014, Original letter of undertaking dated 18.09.2014, Original composite hypothecation agreement dated 18.09.2014, Copy of lawyer's notice dated 20.05.2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saira Phiroz
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Asha Kaimal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akshaya Sivan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of the outstanding loan amount of Rs.2,25,111.10/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Therefore issue No.2 is also found against the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The loan application supports the plaintiff's claim regarding the loan availed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original letter of sanction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The letter of sanction indicates that the plaintiff bank sanctioned the loan to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original letter of undertaking
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter is a formal agreement by the defendant to repay the loan under the bank's terms.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original composite hypothecation agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The hypothecation agreement secures the loan against the vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The lawyer's notice is evidence of the plaintiff's attempts to recover the outstanding loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Fajarudeen K.H regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Fajarudeen K.H regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won