Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 523/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs Anoop K Sasi regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-10-30
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 days
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Anoop K Sasi for the recovery of a loan amounting to Rs. 5,92,046/-. The defendant admitted the liability to repay the borrowed amount but disputed the interest rate.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of Rs. 5,92,046/- along with interest at 6% per annum.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover from the defendant a sum of 5,92,046/- along with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of Rs. 5,92,046/- along with interest at 6% per annum.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved liability through documentary evidence and the defendant's admission.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved liability through documentary evidence and the defendant's admission.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence on record, both documentary and oral, supports the plaintiff’s claim in full. The defendant’s admission further strengthens the case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs. The plaintiff Bank is entitled to recover from the defendant a sum of 5,92,046/-.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anoop K Sasi
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Agreement cum deed of hypothecation dated 03.11.2020, Certified statement of account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thomas Mannanal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K Sunil Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff seeks recovery of Rs. 5,92,046/- with interest.
Evidence:
Hence, I hold that the plaintiff has proved that the defendant is liable to pay the sum of 5,92,046/- together with interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff shall further be entitled to interest at 6% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant to secure the loan.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishing the loan limits and terms sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Certified statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the amount due and outstanding from the defendant.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Oral evidence provided by both parties during the hearing.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Anoop K Sasi regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Anoop K Sasi regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Tue, 11/03/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Sabitha K Sabu et al regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The South Indian Bank Ltd vs Dileep K Ponnappan et al regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sooraj Soman regarding realisation of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs M/s. Sreelakshmi Kudumbasree et al regarding realization of money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Jayamohan.K regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won