Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 684/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs A.J.Enterprises et al regarding non-payment of Balance Court Fee.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-09-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against A.J.Enterprises and Abdul Jabbar regarding the non-payment of balance court fees. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear and make necessary payments.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff failed to appear and make necessary payments.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. Not represented. Balance Court Fee not seen remitted yet.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Plaint is rejected for non-payment of Balance Court Fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.J.Enterprises
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abdul Jabbar
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Saira Phiroz
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shilpa Sasi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kavya Prem
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akhil Poppy Antony
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Susan Kuriakose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dipu James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Soorya B Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint is rejected for non-payment of Balance Court Fee.
Evidence:
Hence, Plaint is rejected for non-payment of Balance Court Fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs A.J.Enterprises et al regarding non-payment of Balance Court Fee.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs A.J.Enterprises et al regarding non-payment of Balance Court Fee.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Ms. Beena Joseph regarding the suit for relief.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between The Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. vs S Francis regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Baiju P.J regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Vineesh Kumar TV et al regarding Settlement of Dispute
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abdul Sattar vs Sudarshana Shenoy et al regarding Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won