Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 684/2023

Case between Canara Bank vs A.J.Enterprises et al regarding non-payment of Balance Court Fee.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-09-09
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against A.J.Enterprises and Abdul Jabbar regarding the non-payment of balance court fees. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint due to the plaintiff's absence and non-payment of the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff failed to appear and make necessary payments.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Plaint is rejected for non-payment of Balance Court Fee.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank (Age not specified years) Kochi Kadavanthra II, Pratana buildings, K.P.Vallon raod, Kadavanthra road, kadavanthra P.O, Ernakulam – 682 020

Defendants

A.J.Enterprises (Age not specified years) Muttungal building, no. 27/2171 Kasturba Nagar – Ernakulam – 682 020 Abdul Jabbar (43 years years) D-7, Lakshadeep Quarters, Panampilly nagar, Kochi – 682 036, Kerala

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaint is rejected for non-payment of Balance Court Fee.
Evidence:
Hence, Plaint is rejected for non-payment of Balance Court Fee.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases