Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO.277 OF 2017

Case between Canara Bank vs Abdul Latheef et al regarding loan recovery

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-11-28
Duration
Less than a year
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against Abdul Latheef and Fathima Shamna seeking recovery of a loan amount due to default in repayment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of Canara Bank, ordering the defendants to repay the loan amount with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree for repayment of loan amount with interest and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit - Loan Recovery
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff bank proved its case through cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: To pay the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs. 7,35,098 with future interest at 9.9% per annum compounded at monthly rests on the principal sum of Rs. 7,29,391 and a penal interest of 2% per annum on Rs. 7,29,391 from the date of suit till the date of realization and cost of the suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank (Age not specified years) B.P.Angadi Branch, 112, J.C. Road, Bangalore-560002

Defendants

Abdul Latheef (40 years) KakkidiPuthiyath Parambil House, Post Muttannur, Purathoor amsom, Tirur Taluk Fathima Shamna (37 years) KakkidiPuthiyath Parambil House, Post Muttannur, Purathoor amsom, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Loan Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree for repayment of loan amount with interest and costs
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: To pay the plaintiff bank an amount of Rs. 7,35,098 with future interest at 9.9% per annum compounded at monthly rests on the principal sum of Rs. 7,29,391 and a penal interest of 2% per annum on Rs. 7,29,391 from the date of suit till the date of realization and cost of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the loan application by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the terms and conditions of the loan sanctioned.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Car Mobile Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the hypothecation of the purchased vehicle.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the guarantee provided for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing the lawyer notice sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Certified copy of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document representing the statement of account with entries certified under Bankers Book Evidence Act.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Thu, 11/23/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases