Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 76/2025

Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs M/S. STAR AQUARIUM et al regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-07-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, has filed a suit against the defendants, who defaulted on a Pradhan Mantri Mudra Yojana loan. The bank seeks to recover ₹2,32,721/- along with interest due to non-repayment.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount with interest. The defendants did not appear in court to contest the claim.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,32,721/- with interest @ 10.3% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the loan amount with interest. The defendants did not appear in court to contest the claim.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendants stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendants stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Supporting Evidence
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendants stands unchallenged and undisputed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/S. STAR AQUARIUM
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SEENA
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Application for Pradhan Manthri Mudra Yojana Loan executed by Seena, Request for overdraft facilities executed by Seena, Cash credit agreement executed by Seena, Pronote executed by Seena, Communication of Repayment Schedule to Borrowers executed by Seena, Sanction letter executed by the Plaintiff Bank and endorsed by the 2nd defendant, Letter of proprietorship executed by Seena, Copy of Registered Loyal Notice issued by Adv. M. Saleem, Postal Receipt, Postal Acknowledgment Card, Computer printout of the statement of Loan Account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Saleem
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Dhanya. M.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought recovery of ₹2,32,721/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of . ₹2,32,721/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Thirty Two Thousand Seven Hundred and Twenty One only) with interest @ 10.3% per annum, from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Plaintiff claimed penal interest of 2%.
Evidence:
The claim of penal interest of 2% is denied as it is against RBI Regulations.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application for Pradhan Manthri Mudra Yojana Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Seena as part of the loan application process.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Request for Overdraft Facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Seena as part of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Seena detailing the credit terms.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Seena as a promise to pay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Communication of Repayment Schedule
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Seena providing repayment details.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the Plaintiff Bank and endorsed by the 2nd defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter of Proprietorship
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by Seena to establish ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of Registered Loyal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by Adv. M. Saleem to notify the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to Ext.A8, providing proof of notice dispatch.
Reference:
Ext.A8(a)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to Ext.A8, providing proof of notice receipt.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Computer printout of the statement of Loan Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showing details of the loan account for claims.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs M/S. STAR AQUARIUM et al regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH vs M/S. STAR AQUARIUM et al regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THOMAS PHILIP regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs V. K. ASHOKAN regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SUBAIR. A. K regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs SUDHEESH. T. K regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MAREENA JOHNY, JOHNY. O. P regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won