Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 84/2024

Case between Canara Bank, Kadavanthra branch, Ernakulam et al vs Annamma Sunny regarding realization of money.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-09-25
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 09/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, seeks repayment of an outstanding loan amount from the defendant, Annamma Sunny. The defendant defaulted on repayments, leading to the bank filing a suit for realization of the owed amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.6,42,338.03/- along with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest and costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted evidence established the defendant's liability to the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted evidence established the defendant's liability to the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1 to A7 established the case as pleaded by plaintiff. ...the plaintiff is entitled to the relief as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.6,42,338.03/- from the defendant and from her assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Annamma Sunny
Relation
Proprietor of M/s. Score Sales and Services
Plaintiffs Documents
Original sanction letter dated 01.12.2020, Original demand promissory note dated 01.12.2020, Original cash credit agreement dated 01.12.2020, Original letter of renewal dated 27.02.2022, Original sanction communication dated 27.02.2022, Copy of lawyer's notice dated 13.01.2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
U. Jayakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Muhammad Shamed K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.6,42,338.03 from the defendant.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows; 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realize a sum of Rs.6,42,338.03/-.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover interest at 12% per annum from the date of the suit.
Evidence:
2. The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12 % per annum for Rs.6,42,338.03/-.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover interest at 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization.
Evidence:
3. The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.6,42,338.03/- from date of decree till date of realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit.
Evidence:
4. The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides evidence of the loan sanction to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as security for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Cash Credit Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the terms of the cash credit facility extended to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original Letter of renewal
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the renewal of the loan facility.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original Sanction Communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Communicates the terms agreed upon for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of formal communication regarding the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Printout of extract or working capital loan account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the outstanding balance and details of the defendant’s loan account.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank, Kadavanthra branch, Ernakulam et al vs Annamma Sunny regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank, Kadavanthra branch, Ernakulam et al vs Annamma Sunny regarding realization of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 12/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 09/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s IDBI Bank vs Shri. Sajeeb V.S regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s M K S Agency, Sandhya Suresh regarding realization of money
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dhanalaxmi Bank Limited vs Thaslim Nazrin V M et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Mrs. Preethymol P.T regarding realization of money
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of Baroda represented by its Chief Manager, Manohar M vs Ratheesh P.S regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won