Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT 75/2025

Case between CANARA BANK et al vs VIJAYAN. M. P regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-08-25
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 08/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, Vijayan. M. P, to recover a loan amount of ₹ 1,91,946 that the defendant failed to repay. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to a decision being made in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, awarding the loan amount with future interest. The defendant was not present, and hence the suit was decreed accordingly.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 1,91,946 with future interest @ 10.5% per annum, from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, awarding the loan amount with future interest. The defendant was not present, and hence the suit was decreed accordingly.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Supporting Evidence
On a perusal of plaint, proof affidavit and documents the claim of the plaintiff to realize the plaint amount stands unchallenged and undisputed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
CANARA BANK, KUTTIADI BRANCH
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
VIJAYAN. M. P
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Common Application form cum appraisal report for credit facilities, Agreement of Hypothecation for Agricultural Loans, Sanction Memorandum, Acknowledgment of debt and security, Lawyer notice, Postal Receipt, Statement of Account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Saleem
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹ 1,91,946 with future interest.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed with costs as follows:- The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of₹ 1,91,946/- (Rupees One Lakh Ninety One Thousand Nine Hundred and Forty Six Only) with future interest @ 10.5 % per annum, from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Relief Type: Penal Interest
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The claim of penal interest is denied.
Evidence:
However, the claim of penal interest is hereby denied.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Common Application Form cum Appraisal report for credit Facilities for Agricultural Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted by the defendant to the plaintiff bank for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement of Hypothecation for Agricultural loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant in favour of the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the plaintiff bank to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
From the defendant to the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sent by Adv. M. Saleem to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Associated with the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5 (a)
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by Canara Bank for the defendant's account.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between CANARA BANK et al vs VIJAYAN. M. P regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between CANARA BANK et al vs VIJAYAN. M. P regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 07/27/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 08/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JITHIN RAJ. K. T. K, RAJAN. K. T. K regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs MUNEER. K. V regarding recovery of loan amount.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MOLLY regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs JAGATH CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won