Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 276/2022

Case between Canara Bank et al vs Aparna Sai et al regarding realisation of money

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-02
Duration
approximately-1 year 10 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendants, who defaulted on repayments. The defendants had taken an educational loan for an MBA course but failed to repay the amount due.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to repay the loan amount along with interest. The suit is granted with costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants directed to pay an amount of Rs. 7,66,914.64 with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a clear case based on uncontested evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: I. The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 7,66,914.64/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Canara Bank (Age not specified years) Maradu Branch, Kuriyapilly Towers, Near P. S. Hospital, Maradu, Ernakulam District – 682 304

Defendants

Aparna Sai (28 years) Allattu Sai Jyothi, Muppathadam, Aluva, Ernakulam – 683 110 Asha Prabhath @ Asha Chandran (51 years) Kakkanam Veedu, Palarivatom, Ernakulam – 682 025

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay an amount of 7,66,914.64/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants are directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 7,66,914.64/-...
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
Considering the nature of the suit and circumstances surrounding the suit, plaintiff is entitled to costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of Power of Attorney marked subject to proof.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Application for Educational Loan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Application for Educational Loan submitted by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Educational Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement executed by the defendants for the educational loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document acknowledging the debt by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of Legal Notice sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned Postal Envelope relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Returned Postal envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned Postal Envelope relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Computer print of Statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement of Account showing the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Authorization letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Authorization Letter related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The evidence of the plaintiff was taken in the absence of written statement of the defendants.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 08/02/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases