Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.214/2019

Case between C. K. Thomas vs Paulson Paulose et al regarding dismissal of suit due to absence.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-06-03
Duration
Case Code No.
214
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C. K. Thomas is the plaintiff, while Paulson Paulose and Petson Paulose are the defendants. The case concerns the dismissal of the suit as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Evidence:

Since plaintiff absent suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C. K. Thomas
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o Late Kochuvareeth
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paulson Paulose
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o Late C.K.Paulose
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Petson Paulose
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o Late C. K. Paulose
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabu P. Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. N. Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreedevi P R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Geetha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S. Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Biju D. Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed due to his absence.
Evidence:
Since plaintiff absent suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor, Ernakulam District, Kerala
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Binojkumar Nair vs Jitha Gopi et al regarding Suit rejection under order 7, Rule 11 C.P.C.
The Munsiff Court of Perumbavoor
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Union Bank of India, Perumbavoor Branch vs Shihab K A regarding Suit not pressed
THE MUNSIFF COURT OF PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Prakash V vs Chummar et al regarding Suit Rejection under Order 7 Rule 11
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Civil Suit Defendant Won