Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 221 OF 2016

Case between Bindu et al vs Kuttan et al regarding partition.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit for partition filed by Bindu and her son Vysakh Mohan against Kuttan and Latha. A compromise petition was filed and the court approved a preliminary decree based on the terms of the compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
A preliminary decree for partition was passed based on the terms of the lawful compromise petition filed by the parties involved.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise were found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of compromise is lawful a preliminary decree is hereby passed as per the terms of compromise.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bindu (39 years years) Kondankadavath House, Naduvattom Amsom, Desom and Post, Tirur Taluk. Vysakh Mohan. T. (11 years years) Thottungal House, Tirur Amsom and Taluk, Porur Desom, Pookkayil Post.

Defendants

Kuttan (50 years years) Thottungal House, Tirur Amsom and Taluk, Porur Desom, Pookkayil Post. Latha (53 years years) Moothedath House, Nannambra Amsom and Desom, Theyyala Post, Tirurangadi Taluk.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Preliminary decree passed as per the terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful a preliminary decree is hereby passed as per the terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases